What action should be taken when SFRM bond strength tests are difficult to accomplish?

When facing difficulties in conducting bond strength tests for spray-applied fire-resistant materials (SFRM), it’s critical to consult with relevant authorities for possible alternate methods. This approach ensures compliance with established codes and standards, which often require specific testing protocols to validate the effectiveness of fireproofing materials. By seeking guidance from regulatory bodies or industry experts, one can identify accepted methodologies that can substitute for the standard tests, maintaining the integrity of the fireproofing system and ensuring that all safety and performance standards are met.

Using alternative evaluation methods without prior approval may lead to non-compliance with safety regulations and standards, potentially exposing the project to risks and liabilities. Proceeding without any testing undermines the reliability of the fireproofing work, and simply documenting the difficulty of testing does not address the need for reliable verification of material performance. Consulting relevant authorities fosters a responsible approach to problem-solving and guarantees that any changes in testing procedures are approved and validated.